Best Bookmakers for Both Teams to Score OddsLive Prices & Lowest Margin
Compare live both teams to score (BTTS) yes/no odds from every tracked bookmaker, side by side, for upcoming football fixtures. We highlight the best available price on every outcome and rank operators by average margin so you can see who consistently pays out the most.
Bookmaker Ratings for Both Teams to Score
Ranked by average overround (margin) calculated from real Both Teams to Score odds. Lower margin means more of every stake is returned as winnings.
| # | Bookmaker | Avg Margin | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.54% | ||
| 2 | 5.11% | ||
| 3 | 5.23% | ||
| 4 | 5.80% | ||
| 5 | 5.81% | ||
| 6 | 5.81% | ||
| 7 | 6.26% | ||
| 8 | 6.33% | ||
| 9 | 6.45% | ||
| 10 | 6.99% |
Margin and payout figures are calculated from live Both Teams to Score odds, updated automatically via API.
Both Teams to Score Odds — Upcoming Fixtures
Side-by-side Both Teams to Score odds for the next 25 fixtures. The best price on every outcome is highlighted in green — search or filter by league to find your match.
| Match |  |  |  |
|---|---|---|---|
YesNo | YesNo | YesNo | |
 Newcastle Bournemouth | 1.482.50 | 1.482.50 | 1.482.50 |
 Degerfors IF Halmstad | 1.811.90 | 1.811.90 | 1.811.90 |
 Gais BK Hacken | 1.482.47 | 1.482.47 | 1.482.47 |
 Fiorentina Torino | 1.831.89 | 1.831.89 | 1.831.89 |
 Bayer Leverkusen Union Berlin | 1.552.32 | 1.552.32 | 1.552.32 |
 Werder Bremen RB Leipzig | 1.472.53 | 1.472.53 | 1.472.53 |
 Borussia Mönchengladbach SV Elversberg | 1.522.40 | 1.522.40 | 1.522.40 |
 1899 Hoffenheim Borussia Dortmund | 1.402.77 | 1.402.77 | 1.402.77 |
 SC Paderborn 07 SC Freiburg | 1.552.32 | 1.552.32 | 1.552.32 |
 Fulham Crystal Palace | 1.662.12 | 1.662.12 | 1.662.12 |
 Brentford Sunderland | 1.791.94 | 1.791.94 | 1.791.94 |
 Manchester City Coventry | —— | —— | —— |
 Brighton Leeds | —— | —— | —— |
 Nottingham Forest Tottenham | 1.662.12 | 1.662.12 | 1.662.12 |
 Athletic Club Atletico Madrid | 1.682.08 | 1.682.08 | 1.682.08 |
 Lens Lorient | 1.751.98 | 1.751.98 | 1.751.98 |
 Vasteras SK FK Sirius | 1.512.39 | 1.512.39 | 1.512.39 |
 Inter Napoli | 1.941.79 | 1.941.79 | 1.941.79 |
 FC Schalke 04 Bayern München | 1.672.10 | 1.672.10 | 1.672.10 |
 Hull City Aston Villa | 1.771.96 | 1.771.96 | 1.771.96 |
 Rayo Vallecano Racing Santander | 1.632.17 | 1.632.17 | 1.632.17 |
 Nice Le Mans | 1.722.02 | 1.722.02 | 1.722.02 |
 Le Havre Stade Brestois 29 | 1.801.92 | 1.801.92 | 1.801.92 |
 AS Roma Atalanta | 1.791.94 | 1.791.94 | 1.791.94 |
 Villarreal Deportivo La Coruna | 1.851.87 | 1.851.87 | 1.851.87 |
NewcastleBournemouthDegerfors IFHalmstadGaisBK HackenFiorentinaTorinoBayer LeverkusenUnion BerlinWerder BremenRB LeipzigBorussia MönchengladbachSV Elversberg1899 HoffenheimBorussia DortmundSC Paderborn 07SC FreiburgFulhamCrystal PalaceBrentfordSunderlandManchester CityCoventryBrightonLeedsNottingham ForestTottenhamAthletic ClubAtletico MadridLensLorientVasteras SK FKSiriusInterNapoliFC Schalke 04Bayern MünchenHull CityAston VillaRayo VallecanoRacing SantanderNiceLe MansLe HavreStade Brestois 29AS RomaAtalantaVillarrealDeportivo La CorunaOdds are decimal format, pulled live from each operator and refreshed automatically. A ▲ green / ▼ red badge under a price shows how far it has drifted or shortened since the market opened. Showing the top 3 books by default — add any of the 12 operators to compare. Always confirm the price on the operator's site before betting.
The Efficiency of Goal Exchanges: Hunting for Value in BTTS
Football Betting Analyst
The market for Both Teams To Score (BTTS) is currently a complex landscape, characterized by a significant divergence in operational efficiency among bookmakers. While the general consensus suggests a high probability of goals being scored by both sides, the underlying odds structure tells a different story—one of systematic value extraction. The core question for the sharp bettor is not merely if the market is offering a price, but how much of that price is genuinely defensible against the sharp reference line. The data overwhelmingly points to a clear market leader who minimizes the cost of capital for the bettor.
The margin picture
When we strip away the noise of promotional pricing and focus purely on the cost structure, the margin picture is stark. A bookmaker’s average margin is the single most critical metric for any long-term bettor. Here, Pinnacle runs a profound structural advantage. Their average margin of just 3.54%, backed by a massive sample size of 1,318 settled markets, is a class of its own. This is a significant gap when compared to the next closest competitor, 188Bet, which sits at 5.23%. This disparity isn't trivial; it represents the difference between a liquid, efficient market and one that quietly taxes the uninformed bettor. The market is not homogeneous. The difference between a 3.54% average margin and the 6.33% offered by Betway is the difference between a profitable edge and a structural drag on your bankroll.
Value & best-price reality
The deeper we dive, the more apparent the market inefficiency becomes. Every single bookmaker tracked here shows a negative value against the sharp reference line. This is the crucial detail the casual bettor misses: the market, as a whole, is quietly clipping the bettor. Pinnacle, despite offering the best overall value at -3.42%, is still operating at a negative expected value. However, the best price remains paramount. The ability to secure the highest payout is what determines the immediate edge. Pinnacle dominates this metric, posting the best price nearly 60% of the time, coupled with an exceptional payout rate of 99.1% of the best available. This combination of best-price frequency and payout reliability is what defines a truly sharp offering. The market is clearly overvaluing the "Both Teams To Score" outcome; it's a classic bubble waiting to burst. We are looking for the lowest cost of entry and the highest probability of securing the best available return.
The verdict
The choice here is clear: Pinnacle. For a sharp bettor, the combination of the lowest average margin (3.54%) and the industry-leading best-price frequency (59.7%) makes this market a no-brainer. While the negative value across the board is a warning flag for the entire market, Pinnacle minimizes the cost of doing business. They provide the best combination of price and structural efficiency. Confidence Level: High
Key takeaways
- The average margin offered by Pinnacle (3.54%) is a profound structural advantage over the competition.
- Best-price frequency is the single most important factor for immediate value capture, and Pinnacle leads this metric decisively.
- While all bookmakers show negative value against the sharp line, Pinnacle minimizes the cost of the bettor's capital.
- The market is systematically extracting value; the goal is to minimize the margin drag.
Gamble responsibly. Liam Carter
Analysis by Liam Carter · updated 4 September 2026. Methodology: data-driven ratings.
We don't just compare odds — we track every tip
Margin rankings show where the best Both Teams to Score prices are. Our verified betting record shows whether our Both Teams to Score picks actually win.